Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Scott SELMER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 156024

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 2015No. A14-98PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent Scott Selmer, alleging that Selmer committed professional misconduct by engaging in a pattern of harassing and frivolous litigation, failing to abide by court orders, and refusing to comply with discovery requests. Following an evidentiary hearing, the referee found that Selmer violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.1, 3.1, 3.4(c), 3.4(d), and 8.4(d) and that several aggravating factors were present. The referee recommended a suspension for a minimum of 12 months. We…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Richard S. Langree, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0234229. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  2. In re Petition for Reinstatement of Scott Selmer, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 156024Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API