Legal Opinion

Suhr v. County of Dodge

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 1, 1931No. 28,376PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to his complaint.

The action is one to recover unliquidated damages for the claimed refusal of defendant to excavate and remove from plaintiff’s land and pay for a part of the gravel needed for the construction and maintenance of certain roads in the county. A contract with the defendant in relation thereto is pleaded. Part of the gravel had been removed and paid for. Plaintiff presented a further claim for damages for failure of defendant to restore the premises to proper condition after removal of the gravel taken.

The complaint alleges…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Monroe County v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. County of Yolo v. JoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Hoyt v. Hughes CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State ex rel. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Polk v. RoebuckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Laurisch v. PohlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Leuthold v. County of RedwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Nadeau v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API