Suhr v. County of Dodge
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to his complaint.
The action is one to recover unliquidated damages for the claimed refusal of defendant to excavate and remove from plaintiff’s land and pay for a part of the gravel needed for the construction and maintenance of certain roads in the county. A contract with the defendant in relation thereto is pleaded. Part of the gravel had been removed and paid for. Plaintiff presented a further claim for damages for failure of defendant to restore the premises to proper condition after removal of the gravel taken.
The complaint alleges…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Monroe County v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- County of Yolo v. JoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Hoyt v. Hughes CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Polk v. RoebuckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Laurisch v. PohlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Leuthold v. County of RedwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Nadeau v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976