Legal Opinion

Klippel v. Beinar

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 11, 1977No. 48,480PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fromme, J.:

This appeal is from an order of the trial court granting motions for summary judgments in favor of defendants, Peter J. Beinar, Joseph W. Vowell and Donald A. High. Plaintiff B. W. Klippel, Jr. appeals.

Appellant Klippel was an oil operator-producer conducting development, production, maintenance and marketing operations on twelve oil leases in Woodson County under oil and gas lease operating agreements covering what is referred to as the East Rose Field Unit.

Appellant filed separate actions against Peter J. Beinar, et al., and against Joseph…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Southland Royalty Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Vaughn v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Merrill Engineering Co. v. Capital Nat. BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Rothwell v. TransmeierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  5. Dobbins v. HodgesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thoroughbred Associates, L.L.C. v. Kansas City Royalty Co., L.L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. Akandas, Inc. v. KlippelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Jackson v. FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. Morgan v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  5. Ivy Ellis Mize and Wife, Voncile Mize v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API