Legal Opinion

Novosad v. Svrcek

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 8, 1935No. 8117PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

The only issue involved in this case is whether a mortgage lien, executed by Knip-pel, owner of the land, in favor of Svrcek, dated November 15, 1928, on lands in Fay-ette county, Tex., is superior to a prior vendor’s lien on said lands securing three notes, dated December 7, 1920, payable to Joe, Frank, and John Novosad, and originally maturing December 7, 1923, 1924, and 1925, respectively. This question depends upon whether or not the Novosad notes were barred by the four-year statutes of limitation (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 5527). The Novosads contend that the limitation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Benson v. PhippsTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Cathey v. WeaverTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Austin Real Estate & Abstract Co. v. BahnTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ellerd v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Kirby v. American State Bank of AmarilloTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Novosad v. SvrcekTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. White v. HixCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Fakes v. VilvenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Seydler v. KeuperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Heinrich v. WinklerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API