Belt v. Andrew Rees- Crocs Inc
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Kevin A. Belt, Case No. 2:24-cv-00582-APG-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 Andrew Rees - Crocs, Inc.; Rick Blackshaw - 9 Hey Dude Shoes, 10 Defendant. 11 12 Under
28 U.S.C. § 1915
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has requested 13 authority to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff also submitted a complaint. (ECF 14 No. 1-1). Because the Court finds that Plaintiff’s application is complete, it grants his application 15 to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court also screens Plaintiff’s complaint and dismisses…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.