Legal Opinion

Belt v. Andrew Rees- Crocs Inc

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided April 15, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00582Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Kevin A. Belt, Case No. 2:24-cv-00582-APG-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 Andrew Rees - Crocs, Inc.; Rick Blackshaw - 9 Hey Dude Shoes, 10 Defendant. 11 12 Under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has requested 13 authority to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff also submitted a complaint. (ECF 14 No. 1-1). Because the Court finds that Plaintiff’s application is complete, it grants his application 15 to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court also screens Plaintiff’s complaint and dismisses…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API