Legal Opinion

Karen v. Cane

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 18, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Roberta L. Dunlop, J.

In this action, the plaintiff (Herbert Karen, doing business *640as Metro Sales Co.) seeks to recover the balance due for goods sold to the defendant (Barbara Cane) pursuant to a sales contract executed by the parties.

The court sets forth the following as its findings of facts and conclusions of law.

The credible evidence adduced during this nonjury trial de nova established that the defendant purchased goods from the plaintiff through two shop-at-home sales transactions.

In the first sales transaction the defendant, after reviewing a sales catalogue,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Electric Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  2. Haughey v. Belmont Quadrangle Drilling Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Barber-Greene Co. v. M. F. Dollard, Jr., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  4. Barber-Greene Co. v. M. F. Dollard, Jr., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Data Documents, Inc. v. Pottawattamie CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Purina Mills, L.L.C. v. LessDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
  3. MLB Sales Incorporated v. RK Gems LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  4. Tobe Products v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API