Legal Opinion

Barber-Greene Co. v. M. F. Dollard, Jr., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 1934PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHefeernan, J.

In this action respondent recovered judgment against appellant for the purchase price of a trencher, which is a large machine used by contractors in excavating ditches and trenches. The suit was brought under subdivision 3 of section 144 of the Personal Property Law reading as follows: “ Although the property in the goods has not passed, if they cannot readily be resold for a reasonable price, and if the provisions of subdivision four of section one hundred and forty-five are not applicable, the seller may offer to deliver the goods to the buyer, and if the buyer refuses to receive them, may…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Morris v. . RexfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Carleton v. . Lombard, Ayres Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. White v. . CorliesNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Schenectady Stove Co. v. . HolbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Catlin v. . TobiasNew York Court of Appeals · 1863

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gram v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Antonucci v. Stevens Dodge, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  3. Ingrassia v. Shell Oil CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  4. USA Cable v. World Wrestling Federation Entertainment, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  5. Shapiro v. Queens County Jockey ClubCity of New York Municipal Court · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API