Legal Opinion
Allard v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (U.S.A.)
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 11, 1997No. 84 Civ. 7703 (MBM). 85 Civ. 1292 (MBM)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
This opinion treats defendants’ renewed motion in these related cases for a summary judgment, following a hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(e) 1 on the issue of whether or not one of plaintiff Department of Economic Development’s (“DED”) predecessors in interest, the Northern Ireland Development Agency (“NIDA”), made a new investment decision for federal securities law purposes when it agreed on March 12,1980 to revise the terms of a put it held with respect to preference shares of DeLorean Motor Corporation, Ltd. (“DMCL”),…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Nowak v. Ironworkers Local 6 Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,956 David Broad v. Rockwell International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chenensky v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Masterwear Corp. v. Rubin Baum Levin Constant & Friedman (In Re Masterwear Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Metz v. United Counties BancorpDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Sorias v. National Cellular USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Turner v. New York Rosbruch/Harnik, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.