Legal Opinion
Metz v. United Counties Bancorp
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 24, 1999No. Civil Action 96-5276(WHW)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of the defendants to dismiss Counts III through XII of the amended complaint. The motion is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants and plaintiffs have filed cross motions for summary judgment on Count I of the amended complaint. The Court grants the defendants’ cross motion and denies that of the plaintiffs.
Factual Background
The eighty plaintiffs are all former employees of the now defunct defendant United Counties Bankcorporation (“United Counties”). Some were also shareholders. Through the process of two…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Harrow v. Prudential Insurance Company Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- In Re Countrywide Financial Corporation Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Scott v. BoosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Rhodes v. Marix Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Nasik Breeding & Research Farm Ltd. v. Merck & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.