Sharp Equipment Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge FRIEDMAN.
I respectfully concur and dissent. I agree with the majority that the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) correctly determined that Martha J. Lykens (Claimant) was an employee of Sharp Equipment Company (Employer), not an independent contractor. However, I disagree that, after the Board made that determination, the Board erred in failing to consider whether Claimant had a necessitous and compelling reason for voluntarily leaving her employment with Employer.
The regulation at 34 Pa.Code § 101.87 (emphasis added) provides as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wing v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Hine v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Classic Personnel v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Mauro v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000