Legal Opinion

Mauro v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Philip S. Mauro (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (UCBR) affirming the order of a referee that denied Claimant unemployment benefits pursuant to section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law). 1 We reverse.

On April 12, 1999, Claimant began working as a carpenter/foreman for Pencóse (Employer). However, Claimant voluntarily left this position on April 19, 1999 after one week of employment. (Referee’s 2 Findings of Fact, Nos. 1, 4.)

Claimant applied for unemployment compensation at the local job center, stating that he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Fitzgerald v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Shrum v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. St. Barnabas, Inc. v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. A-Positive Electric v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. D. Yingling v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Devon Preparatory School v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Sharp Equipment Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Sharp Equipment Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API