Commonwealth v. Townsend
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
The defendants, Charles Townsend and Flossie Townsend, his wife, were convicted of the larceny by trick, of $122 from Ida Lee Butler. From the respective sentences imposed upon them they have appealed to this court.
The particular trick, by which Mrs. Butler’s money was taken from her, is known in underworld lingo as ‘flim-flam’ or ‘drop-pigeon’ 1 — a form of ‘bunco’ or ‘confidence game’. It was described by Mrs. Butler roughly as follows:
While shopping in a store market on June 9, 1941, around 12:30 p.m. she was engaged in conversation by a woman, whom she had never…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilkinson v. . GillNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Commonwealth v. BanksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Commonwealth v. LundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commonwealth v. ChiricoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Fo America v. Orville J. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- People v. ClayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- State v. MarksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- United States v. Henry Daniel Stull, Sr., and Henry Daniel Stull, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Commonwealth v. MatteraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.