Legal Opinion
Hill Roofing Co. v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 24, 2004No. A03A2499PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
Raymond L. Hill appeals from the $12,948.97 judgment entered on the verdict directed in favor of Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc. (“Lowe’s”) in its suit to recover on Hill’s personal guaranty of Hill Roofing Company, Inc.’s (“Hill Roofing”) account. We affirm.
A directed verdict is proper only if there is no conflict in the evidence as to any material issue and the evidence introduced, with all reasonable deductions therefrom, shall demand a particular verdict. OCGA § 9-11-50 (a). In determining whether any conflict in the evidence exists, the court must construe the evidence most…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crawford v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- First Union National Bank v. GurleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Fidelity National Bank v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Bumgarner v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Blalock v. Central Bank of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vratsinas Construction Co. v. Triad Drywall, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Christie v. Rainmaster Irrigation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- RHL PROPERTIES, LLC v. NeeseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Triad Drywall, LLC v. Vratsinas Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Vratsinas Construction Company v. Triad Drywall, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013