Legal Opinion
RHL PROPERTIES, LLC v. Neese
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 6, 2008No. A08A1306PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bernes, Judge.
RHL Properties, LLC appeals from the jury verdict in favor of Holly Yarborough on her claim for breach of a home warranty. RHL Properties contends that it was entitled to a directed verdict on the warranty claim because Yarborough did not strictly comply with the contractual notice requirements. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
A directed verdict is proper only if there is no conflict in the evidence as to any material issue and the evidence introduced, with all reasonable deductions therefrom, shall demand a particular verdict. OCGA § 9-11-50 (a). In determining…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McDaniel v. Mallary Bros. Machinery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Department of Transportation v. Dalton Paving & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Atkinson v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Apac-Georgia, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Biltmore Construction Co. v. Tri-State Electrical Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Callaway v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Troutman v. TroutmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Parks v. Thompson Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Seaberg v. Atlas Roofing Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
- Sheely v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.