Legal Opinion
Watkins Co. v. Mims
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 2, 1926No. 17000PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. “Rulings upon the sufficiency of pleadings are not proper subject-matter for a motion for a new trial.” Coulson v. State, 13 Ga. App. 148 (2), 150 (78 S. E. 1108), and citations; Tompkins v. American Land Co., 139 Ga. 377 (2) (77 S. E. 623), and citations. Under the foregoing ruling there is no merit in special ground 1 of the motion for a new trial.
2. The 2d special ground of the motion for a new trial alleges that the court “erred in admitting the following material evidence, to wit: the certificate of discharge in bankruptcy to C. S. Lee.” This ground is imperfect because it does not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tompkins v. American Land Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- McCollum v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- McCall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Roddenberry Hardware Co. v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- City of LaGrange v. PoundsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- McCranie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Davis v. McKenzie Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Clark v. Calhoun National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.