McCall v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
(Certiorari granted by tbe Supreme Court.) Indictment for seduction; from Crisp superior court—Judge Crum. December 31, 1918.
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, P. J.
1. Under repeated decisions of this court and of the
Supreme Court, each special ground of a motion for a new trial must be complete within itself; and when so incomplete as to require a reference to the brief of the evidence, or to some other portion of the record, in order to determine what was the alleged error and whether such error was material, the ground will not be considered by the reviewing court. Under this ruling the 1st, 2d, 3d, 4th, 5th, and 7th special grounds of the motion for a new trial will not be considered. Some of these grounds are also defective in other particulars.
2.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stapleton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Sable v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Cathey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Stembridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.