Legal Opinion
Dahl v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 11, 2003No. 01-4174PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs brought suit against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2674, alleging that the United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) wrongfully destroyed a stockpile of mineral ore on their mining claim. The district court dismissed their FTCA claim on the ground that they had failed to present the claim to the BLM within the two-year limitations period set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). We affirm, holding that the limitations period commenced to run when the BLM…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Barrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Catellus Development Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Matson v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Franklin Savings Corp. v. United States (In Re Franklin Savings Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Ingrum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Barnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- LaFleur v. Teen HelpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Pilatus Business Aircraft, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.