Legal Opinion

Jordan v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 26, 2016No. 15-1175CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to Dismiss; Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; Pro Se Plaintiff; Procedural Due Process; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Constitution of the State of Illinois; “Bivens Action”; Second, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution; Lack of Jurisdiction

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge

Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs pro se amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). In addition, plaintiff…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Class v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  2. Dell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  3. Frazier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  4. Ramirez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API