Legal Opinion

O'Byrne v. McNeill

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 1, 1932No. 12,346PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Adams

John McNeill sued his former attorney, Con K. 0’Byrne, to procure a decree of court establishing that the defendant O’Byrne is holding- certain mining property under a certificate of sale from the sheriff, in trust for the benefit of plaintiff and defendant. We refer to Mc-Neill as plaintiff, to O’Byrne as defendant, and omit unnecessary references to the sheriff of Gilpin county, impleaded with 0 ’Byrne. Upon trial to the court the findings in the large were for plaintiff; the court decreed that defendant is a trustee for the plaintiff as to a fractional interest in the certificate of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Knox v. McFarranSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
  2. Warren v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  3. Kayser v. MaughamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  4. Bohm v. BohmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  5. Walker v. BruceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'Byrne v. ScofieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. Vandewiele v. VandewieleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  3. Page v. ClarkColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Harvey v. BallaghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API