Legal Opinion

Kayser v. Maugham

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1885PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Hinsdale County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHelm, J.

This is an action in equity. It was brought for the purpose of compelling defendant to convey to' plaintiff the legal title to one-half of a certain mine in the complaint described; and to account for and pay over one-half of the proceeds from the working thereof. The theory upon which the complaint was drawn is that the defendant obtained title to the mine named, with the assistance of plaintiff, ‘through an equal copartnership arrangement between them, initiated for the purpose of purchasing and selling the same to third parties. That upon repayment to defendant of one-half the purchase…

2Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hoge v. GeorgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Von Trotha v. BambergerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Meagher v. ReedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  4. Walker v. BruceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. Willis v. CrawfordOregon Supreme Court · 1901

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API