Yivo Institute for Jewish Research v. Zaleski
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
SHARER, Judge.
In this appeal we are called upon to consider the doctrine of ademption by satisfaction (or advancement), a concept of Maryland jurisprudence taken up only infrequently by our appellate courts. Appellant, the YIVO Institute for Jewish Research, asks this Court to reverse a ruling by the Orphans’ Court for Montgomery County 1 that it was not entitled to distribution of a bequest in the will of Jan Karski. Appellees are the personal representative of the estate, and two (of several) beneficiaries, the Kosciuszko Foundation and The American Center of Polish Culture.
Two questions…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- J.L. Matthews, Inc. v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Farley v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- ST Systems Corp. v. Maryland National BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Wallace v. Du BoisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
- Associated Professors of Loyola College v. DuganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- YIVO Institute for Jewish Research v. ZaleskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Russell v. Penn Township Planning CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975