Russell v. Penn Township Planning Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Judge Mencer :
I respectfully dissent I hold to the view that a 15,000-square-foot lot area requirement for mobile home park *202usage is an unreasonable regulation. My reasons for such a view are fully set forth in my dissenting opinions filed in Delaware County Investment Corporation v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Township of Middletown, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 12, 847 A.2d 513 (1975), and in Colonial Park for Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board, 5 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 594, 290 A.2d 719 (1972).1
Judge Kramer joins in this dissent.. Although these two cases were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Colonial Park for Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Delaware County Investment Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Yivo Institute for Jewish Research v. ZaleskiCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004