Legal Opinion

YIVO Institute for Jewish Research v. Zaleski

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 11, 2005No. 56, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

In this case we are asked to revise the Maryland law of ademption by satisfaction and require that a testator’s intention to adeem a legacy can be proven only by a writing made contemporaneous with an inter vivos gift.. Petitioner, in its attempt to persuade us to change the law, relies in part on the assertion that the doctrine of ademption is in conflict with Md.Code (2001), § 3-106 of the Estates & Trusts Article, the Restatement (Third) of the Law of Property (Wills and Other Donative Transfers) § 5.4 (1999), and the Uniform Probate Code § 2-609 (amended 1990). In addition, petitioner…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Robeson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Nesbit v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. In Re the Accounting of BrannNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Offutt v. Montgomery County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Solomon v. SolomonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Plank v. CherneskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Minh-Vu Hoang v. Hewitt Avenue Associates, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Jackson v. 2109 Brandywine, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Royal Investment Group, LLC v. WangCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API