Legal Opinion

In re Chickosky

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Decided October 1, 2013No. Nos. 12-20562 (ASD), 12-21324 (ASD)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION OF DEBTORS’ SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 12 PLANS AND AN ORDER DENYING CONFIRMATION

ALBERT S. DABROWSKI, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On March 14, 2012, Alexander K. and Maurine D. Chickosky (hereinafter, the “Chickoskys”, or together with Enfield Shade Tobacco, LLC, the “Debtors”) filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 12 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. On May 30, 2012, Enfield Shade Tobacco, LLC (hereinafter “Enfield Shade”) filed its own voluntary petition under Chapter 12 of the Bankruptcy Code. On July 30, 2012, this Court granted the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Central Trust Co. v. KneelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. In Re FoertschUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1994
  3. In Re Mann Farms, Inc., Debtor. Traders State Bank of Poplar v. Mann Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. In Re CrowleyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1988
  5. In Re HowardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re: Kevin Wayne Martin Susan MartinUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. In re: Rhonda Stijakovich-SantilliUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Kenneth W Worden and Patricia M WordenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2023
  4. Wayne Glenn Holland and Misty Jo HollandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API