Legal Opinion
United States v. Headdress
District Court, D. Utah
Decided November 14, 1996No. 2:95-cv-00249PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
On November 1, 1996, United States Magistrate Judge Ronald N. Boyce issued a Report and Recommendation in this case, recommending that the defendants’ motion to suppress be denied. No objections were filed. The court finds that the magistrate’s findings and conclusions are correct in all respects, and hereby adopts the magistrate’s Report and Recommendation as the order of the court. Accordingly, defendant’s motion to suppress is DENIED.
REPORT & RECOMMENDATION
BOYCE, United States Magistrate Judge.
The defendants, Royja Ankerpont and Charles Headdress, have been…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. CooperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- United States v. BeckwithDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1998
- United States v. McKinleyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
- United States v. SolisDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999