Legal Opinion

Todd v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 7, 1973No. 1 CA-CIV. 1894PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Judge.

The only question presented on this appeal in a libel action is whether the affidavit testimony of defendant-appellee Stephen L. Cox was absolutely privileged as a statement made in the course of a judicial proceeding. The trial judge was of the opinion that it was, and therefore granted defendant Cox’s motion for summary judgment.

The appellant-plaintiff Richard Todd, was a prosecution witness in the casi of State v. Brazil, Maricopa County Superior Court No. CR-60857. Brazil’s attorneys believed that Brazil’s conviction was in part due to Todd’s testimony. Brazil’s attorneys…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jarman v. OffuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Middlesex Concrete Products & Excavating Corp. v. Carteret Industrial Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Stewart v. FaheyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Schmitt v. MannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Burke v. RyanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Green Acres Trust v. LondonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Ritchie v. KrasnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. Adams v. PeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Cullison v. City of PeoriaArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Burns v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API