Haines v. First Nat. Bank
Oregon Supreme Court
From Douglas: Jambs W. Hamilton, Judge. Department 1. The plaintiff grounds his cause of action on the statement, in substance, that on April 6, 1908, he had on deposit in the defendant bank $2,221.71, since which time the defendant has paid to him $221.71, and no more, leaving a balance of $2,000 which has not been paid by the defendant, although the plaintiff has demanded the same.
Read the full summary
From Douglas: Jambs W. Hamilton, Judge. Department 1. The plaintiff grounds his cause of action on the statement, in substance, that on April 6, 1908, he had on deposit in the defendant bank $2,221.71, since which time the defendant has paid to him $221.71, and no more, leaving a balance of $2,000 which has not been paid by the defendant, although the plaintiff has demanded the same. Among other things, the answer contains this language: “Denies that the plaintiff'withdrew from said bank on the 6th day of April, 1908, and since that date, the sum of $221.71 only, but alleges the fact to be…
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, J. —
The record contains many assignments of error, some of which we find it unnecessary to consider. Having testified, admitting that he had received the statement of account mentioned and that he had not made objection to it, the plaintiff introduced in evidence a printed circular of date June 17, 1911, announcing the consolidation of the defendant bank with the Douglas National Bank and the purpose to carry on banking business under the name of and in the rooms of the Douglas National Bank. The plaintiff testified that he had received this through the mail, but nothing appeared in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carlon v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Verrell v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Byron v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Chapman v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Doerstler v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bank of California National Ass'n v. Portland Hide & Wool Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- First National Bank v. ConnollyOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Blakeley v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Cross v. AmorettiWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
- Handy v. US Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.