Legal Opinion

Cross v. Amoretti

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1932No. 1715PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bltjme, Justice.

This is an action by plaintiff Edith Cross against Amoretti, Welty, Helmer & Company, a partnership, and against the individual surviving partners and against the receiver of the partnership. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendants appeal.

The partnership above mentioned conducted a privately owned bank at a small place, named Dubois, in this state, with a capital of $10,000.00, doing business from 1913 or 1914 to about the middle of 1927. E. B. Helmer, one of the partners, had the active and apparently exclusive management of the bank. He…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Western National Bank v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Coats v. . DonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Smith v. . RentzNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. L'Herbette v. Pittsfield National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stone v. First Wyoming Bank N. A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  2. Roberts v. RobertsWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Stone v. First Wyoming BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  4. Evans v. Pioneer Bank of Evanston, Wyo.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Cooksley, Lloyd & Chubb v. Wyoming Wool Marketing Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API