Legal Opinion
Bagwill v. Spence
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1932No. Docket No. 4393PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiffs had judgment for the sale price of an automobile based upon a complaint containing two counts, one charging an open book account, and one charging the indebtedness arising from the sale and delivery of the automobile as and on account of the sale of goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendant, upon which there was due and unpaid the purchase price thereof.
Upon this appeal the appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings of the court, and that no action could be maintained for the purchase price of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Parke & Lacy Co. v. White River Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Johnson v. KaeserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Elsom v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- George J. Birkel Co. v. NastCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- James v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Sims v. CrowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- D. N. & E. Walter & Co. v. Efficient Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968