Legal Opinion

Krontz v. Estovez

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 1973No. Docket 14503PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Burns, J.

The facts of this case are not in dispute. On July 16, 1967, the plaintiffs were involved in an automobile collision with the defendant. As a result of the accident, plaintiffs filed a complaint against the defendant on April 24, 1970, two months before the statute of limitations expired. A copy of the summons and complaint was given to the sheriff for service on May 3, 1970. However, on May 5, 1970, the sheriff’s office returned the complaint and summons unserved with the explanation that the defendant had left Michigan in 1967 or 1968 and had taken up residence at Agüero #11, Buenos Aires,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buscaino v. RhodesMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hammel v. BettisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Wright v. Estate of TreichelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Holland v. IttnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carol Anita Ringrose and Frederick Ringrose v. Engelberg Huller Co., Inc., Sundstrand Corporation and White Consolidated, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. Tarter v. InscoWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Goniwicha v. HarkaiMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Fulton v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Brashers v. JeffersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API