Legal Opinion

City of Fort Scott v. Pelton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Bourbon District Court. On February 27,1888, li. H. Pelton was found guilty and adjudged to pay a fine of $25 and the costs of prosecution, for the alleged offense of canvassing for and selling books in the city of Fort Scott without having a license so to do from said city. Pelton appeals. The material facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

The facts of this case are substantially as follows: On December 24, 1887, a complaint was filed in the police court of the city of Fort Scott, charging that the defendant, H. H. Pelton, did on said day “canvass for and sell books in the said city of Fort Scott, withopt having taken out a license for the same.” Subsequently, but on the same day, he was arrested, tried, found guilty, and sentenced to pay a fine of $10 and the costs of suit. From the judgment rendered on this trial he appealed to the district court of Bourbon county, where…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Corson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HickoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Clements v. Town of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
  3. In re TinsmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API