Legal Opinion
In re Tinsman
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
Decided July 17, 1899No. 12,746PublishedCited by 1 opinion
On Petition of P. W. Tinsman for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
Ordinance No. 51 of. the town of Sausalito, Cal., adopted October 14, 1895, provides, among other things, as follows:
*649“Section 1. It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in or carry on any' business, trade, profession or calling, for the transaction or carrying on of which a license is required, without first taking out or procuring the license required for such business, trade, profession or calling. * * *
“Sec. 11. The rates of license shall be according to the following schedule: * * * (10) From each person or firm not maintaining a place of business nor beeping a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Brennan v. TitusvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Telegraph Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Stoutenburgh v. HennickSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ex parte GreenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1902