Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Veronica P. v. Radcliff A.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 12, 2015No. 12PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Abdus-Salaam, J.
We are confronted with the question of whether an appeal from a contested order of protection issued by Family Court, based upon a finding that the subject individual has committed a family offense, is mooted solely by the expiration of the order. We hold that it is not.
In 2009, respondent Radcliff A. regularly stayed in an apartment with his aunt, petitioner Veronica E On September 22, 2009, petitioner filed a petition charging respondent with various family offenses under Family Court Act article 8, alleging that, on certain occasions during the previous…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Coleman v. DainesNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Bickwid v. DeutschNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct v. RubensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Veronica P. v. Radcliff A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3Cited by113 opinions
- Matter of Elizabeth C. (Omar C.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Elizabeth X. v. Irving Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Lisa T. v. King E. T.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2017
- Matter of Jermaine T. (Jairam T.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of Baby Boy D. (Adanna C.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.