Legal Opinion

Hibernia Securities Co. v. Pirie

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The plaintiff brings this action as assignee of the state superintendent of banks to recover from the defendant, a stockholder in the Hibernia Commercial & Savings Bank, the super-added liability imposed by § 3 of article XI of the constitution of the state of Oregon.

To each of the three affirmative answers of defendant to the complaint the plaintiff interposed demurrers on the ground that the same did not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense, and when the demurrers were overruled the plaintiff elected not to plead further. Judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendant was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. United States v. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Corporation Commission v. . MurpheySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. State Bank of Portland v. GotshallOregon Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Skinner v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Harrison v. SkinnerOregon Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API