Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Davis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This proceeding was instituted by the superintendent of banks of the state of Oregon, as plaintiff, against Carl L. Davis and other stockholders within the state of Oregon of the Bank of Southwestern Oregon, of Marshfield, and the attorney general of this state, for a declaratory judgment as to the duties and powers of the plaintiff as statutory liquidator of that hank, and the rights and obligations of the defendant stockholders.

The following statement is substantially as set forth in the amended complaint: The bank was organized March 12, 1917, under the banking laws of this state, and ever…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. State ex rel. Everding v. SimonOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  3. State v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Opinion of the Justices to the Governor & CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Beedle v. Stondall Land & Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bushman v. VandenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Moro v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Parker v. Blackwell Zinc CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Harrison v. SkinnerOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Moro v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API