Sinking Spring Water Co. v. Gring
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 344, Jan. T., 1916, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Berks Co., April T., 1916, No. 18, dismissing exceptions to petition for appointment of viewers in the case of Sinking Spring Water Company v. Catharine Gring. Exceptions to petition for the appointment of viewers, Before Endlich, P. J, The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. The court dismissed the exceptions. Catharine Gring appealed. Error assigned was in dismissing the exceptions.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This appeal is from the dismissal of exceptions to the petition of the appellee for the appointment of viewers to assess the damages, if any, sustained by the appellant in its taking her property in the exercise of an alleged right of eminent domain. . The action of the court below is clearly not a final decree. ' No judgment or decree is final that does not terminate the litigation between the parties to the suit: Pennsylvania Steel Company’s App., 161 Pa. 571. The appeal is, therefore, quashed, at appellant’s costs, without prejudice to her right to raise, in this court, on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Second StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
3Cited by17 opinions
- Stadler v. Mt. Oliver BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Sundheim v. Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Quarture Et Ux. v. Allegheny Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Gring v. Sinking Spring Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.