Legal Opinion
Eubanks v. Akridge
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 25, 1954No. 35217PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.
“Where certain conduct is alleged to be negligent, it is a jury question whether such conduct constitutes negligence if reasonable minds might differ upon the question.” Georgia Power Co. v. Blum, 80 Ga. App. 618 (2) (57 S. E. 2d 18). And where negligence is charged, then if reasonable minds might differ as to what degree of negligence the defendant’s conduct amounts to, this also is a jury question. West v. Rosenberg, 44 Ga. App. 211 (160 S. E. 808).
Three acts of the defendant are charged in this petition to be gross negligence. One of these allegations, to the effect that the defendant was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hudgins v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Georgia Power Company v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Doyal v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Kemp v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- West v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Richards & Associates, Inc. v. StudstillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Austin v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Werbell v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- McPhail v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Stanfield v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.