Legal Opinion

McPhail v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1956No. 35989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.

The plaintiff insists that the trial judge erred in disallowing the following amendment: “And said defendant was further grossly negligent in failing to see said train upon said track, and in failing to stop or turn said vehicle so as to avoid a collision with said train.” The defendants objected to the amendment as a conclusion of the pleader without any facts alleged upon which to base the conclusion pleaded. The amendment stated a mere conclusion and the trial judge did not err in disallowing it.

The petition as amended alleged no act of negligence on the part of the defendants Guy L. Bynum…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hudgins v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Reed v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  3. Bryson v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Harden v. Georgia RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Trammell v. Columbus RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Abercrombie v. Ledbetter-Johnson Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Gulf Oil Corporation v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Hillinghorst v. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Ragland v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Abercrombie v. Ledbetter-Johnson Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API