Legal Opinion

Haney v. Kinevan

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1946No. Civ. 14979Published

1Opinion of the Court

73 Cal.App.2d 343 (1946)

GEORGE E. HANEY et al., Appellants,

v.

EMMET J. KINEVAN et al., Respondents.

Civ. No. 14979.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

Feb. 28, 1946.

Henry Sterling Gill for Appellants.

Leland Crawford for Respondents.

McCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of defendants in an action to quiet title to certain property located in Santa Barbara County, plaintiffs appeal.

[1a] This is the sole question necessary for us to determine:

Were plaintiffs barred by the provisions of section 318 of the Code of Civil Procedure from maintaining the present action?

This question must be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. South Tule Independent Ditch Co. v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Townsend v. DriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Patchett v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Haney v. KinevanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API