Mason and Dixon Lines, Inc. v. STEUDLE
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING MOTIONS AND EMERGENCY MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, DISMISSING AMENDED AND INTERVENOR COMPLAINTS, AND DENYING OTHER MOTIONS AS MOOT
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs and intervening plaintiffs are all common carrier companies operating tractor trailers transporting goods domestically and internationally. They allege that they regularly use the Ambassador Bridge (the Bridge) to make the passage from the United States to Canada. They have filed a complaint against officials of the Michigan Department of…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Garza v. City of La PorteDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
- Sivak v. United Parcel Service Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- The Mason and Dixon Lines Inc. v. Kirk SteudleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- In re MorounMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Planet Aid v. Ypsilanti TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014