Legal Opinion
Warren County Combined Health District v. Rittenhouse
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 21, 1997No. Nos. CA96-06-048 and CA96-06-049PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Powell, Judge.
Defendants-appellees, Kurt Rittenhouse and Phillip Carter, are residents of Warren County, Ohio, and each owns a Canadian cougar. In March 1995, appellees were contacted by the Warren County Combined Health District (“WCCHD”) and advised that they were prohibited from owning or harboring the cougars by Sections 8(A), 8(C), and 9(A) of the Warren County Combined Health District Rabies Control Regulation (“Rabies Control Regulation”). Section 8(A) of the Rabies Control Regulation provides that “no person shall own, harbor, sell, feed, import or otherwise attempt to exercise any…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Candler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Parker v. CushmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Newman v. Cleveland Museum of Natural HistoryOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Harris v. Rootstown Township Zoning Board of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- James Burns, Individually and as Next Friend of Eric Burns, a Minor, Plaintiff v. M.A. Gleason, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nicholson v. Herman, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Ellingston v. LloydAlaska Supreme Court · 2014