Newman v. Cleveland Museum of Natural History
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
In the interest of clarity George and Audrey Newman will be designated as plaintiffs and The Cleveland Museum of Natural History as defendant..
The judgment entries in the Court of Appeals are identical and read as follows:
‘ ‘ This cause came on to be heard upon the pleadings, and the transcript of the record in the Court of Common Pleas, and was argued by counsel; on consideration whereof, the court certifies, that in its opinion substantial- justice has not been done the party complaining, as shown by the record of the proceedings and judgment under review, and the judgment of the' said…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- Jacob Laub Baking Co. v. MiddletonOhio Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by10 opinions
- HE Butt Grocery Company v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Moloney v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- City and County of Denver v. KennedyColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
- Williams v. First United Church of ChristOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. HartmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.