Mota v. Gruszczynski
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Mary J. Boyle, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Thomas Mota, a licensed bounty hunter, was attacked by a dog while pursuing Jerome J. Gruszczynski inside the residence of Jerome J.’s parents — the defendants-appellees, Jerome M. and Marion Gruszczynski. Mota and his wife, Bryn, subsequently brought a lawsuit against Jerome M. and Marion, alleging claims for (1) negligence, (2) strict liability under R.C. 955.28(B) (Ohio’s dog-bite statute), and (3) loss of consortium. The trial court granted the Gruszczynskis’ motion for summary judgment, and Mota and his wife now appeal, raising…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. KoleOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Light v. Ohio UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Darfus v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Steven Oliver v. Henry W. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Darius Hughes v. Speedway, LLC.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
- Hawkins v. K&D Mgt., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Morrow v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.