Legal Opinion

Mota v. Gruszczynski

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 2012No. 97089PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mary J. Boyle, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Thomas Mota, a licensed bounty hunter, was attacked by a dog while pursuing Jerome J. Gruszczynski inside the residence of Jerome J.’s parents — the defendants-appellees, Jerome M. and Marion Gruszczynski. Mota and his wife, Bryn, subsequently brought a lawsuit against Jerome M. and Marion, alleging claims for (1) negligence, (2) strict liability under R.C. 955.28(B) (Ohio’s dog-bite statute), and (3) loss of consortium. The trial court granted the Gruszczynskis’ motion for summary judgment, and Mota and his wife now appeal, raising…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. KoleOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Light v. Ohio UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Darfus v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Steven Oliver v. Henry W. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Darius Hughes v. Speedway, LLC.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
  4. Hawkins v. K&D Mgt., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Morrow v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API