Shaak v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NEWMAN, Justice.
The Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare (“DPW”) has appealed from the order of the Commonwealth Court, which held that the corpus of an irrevocable trust, created by Appellee Elizabeth Shaak (Mrs. Shaak), was not an “available resource” to be considered when determining her eligibility for Medical Assistance benefits. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the order of the Commonwealth Court.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 6, 1988, Mrs. Shaak created an irrevocable trust into which she transferred the ownership of her home in Lebanon, Pennsylvania, naming…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lang v. Com., Dept. of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. BruderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Snyder v. Dept. of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Estate of Rosenberg v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DeBone v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Estate of Taylor v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Lane v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003