Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bruder

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1987No. 2176PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence, following a non-jury trial, for driving under the influence of alcohol and related offenses. We reverse and remand.

The issues presented for our review are: (1) whether the criminal complaint should have been dismissed due to its defects; (2) whether certain evidence was properly admitted at trial; and (3) whether the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence.

A patrolman stopped appellant Bruder’s car after the officer saw him pass a red light. The patrolman also witnessed what he described as Bruder’s erratic driving…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. GriscavageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. BruderSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. DouglassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. ConwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. LeibSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API