Commonwealth v. Bruder
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CIRILLO, President Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence, following a non-jury trial, for driving under the influence of alcohol and related offenses. We reverse and remand.
The issues presented for our review are: (1) whether the criminal complaint should have been dismissed due to its defects; (2) whether certain evidence was properly admitted at trial; and (3) whether the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence.
A patrolman stopped appellant Bruder’s car after the officer saw him pass a red light. The patrolman also witnessed what he described as Bruder’s erratic driving…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commonwealth v. GriscavageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. BruderSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. DouglassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. ConwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. LeibSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.