Legal Opinion

Lombardo v. Borsky

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 20, 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

STERN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing her complaint against defendants, Martin Borsky, M.D., and St. Peter’s Medical Center, alleging the failure to obtain informed consent before Dr. Borsky implanted an experimental intraocular lens into plaintiffs right eye.1 The order was entered after a “Lopez hearing.” See Lopez v. Swyer, 62 N.J. 267, 300 A.2d 563 (1973). The trial judge “concluded that as of January 1988 at the latest, the plaintiff was aware of sufficient facts which would alert a reasonable person that the conduct of third…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Burd v. New Jersey Telephone CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Tevis v. TevisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Perna v. PirozziSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. Lynch v. RubackySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baird v. American Medical OpticsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. Teilhaber v. GreeneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  3. Baird v. American Medical OpticsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  4. Bennett v. Surgidev Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  5. Baird v. American Medical OpticsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API