Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 2009No. WD 69645PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS H. NEWTON, Chief Judge.

Mr. Curtis L. Martin appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Martin pled guilty to first-degree domestic assault, section 565.072, and kidnapping, section 565.110, and received concurrent terms of thirteen years, the maximum sentence under his plea agreement. He contends the sentencing court relied on prejudicial hearsay within pre-sentence investigation (PSI) reports and deprived him of his constitutional rights to due process of law and right to be confronted with witnesses against him. We affirm.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. State v. AntwineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. State v. McMillinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Robert Childs v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Reeder John v. Billie Brewer Curry, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API