Legal Opinion

Fritzeen v. Gravel

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 23, 2003No. 02-075PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Plaintiffs Erie and Louise Fritzeen and William and Constance B. Coates appeal a decision of the Chittenden Superior Court granting summary judgment to defendant, attorney John Gravel. The trial court found that plaintiffs’ claim for legal malpractice was barred by 12 V.S.A. § 511 (“A civil action ... shall be commenced within six years after the cause of action accrues and not thereafter.”). Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in determining that the cause of action accrued before the conclusion of the appeal in the underlying proceeding. We affirm.

¶ 2. The trial court found the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Apex Towing Co. v. TolinTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Fritzeen v. Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. Silvestrone v. EdellSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  5. Lucey v. Law Offices of Pretzel & Stouffer, CharteredAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hedges v. DurranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. Huff v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. Stephen Aguiar v. David WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  4. William Strong v. Edward D. Fitzpatrick and Bergeron, Paradis & Fitzpatrick, LLPSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  5. Brady Vorwerck v. New Albertson'sNevada Supreme Court · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API