Legal Opinion
Nixon-Foster Service Co. v. Morrow
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1936No. 4233PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUDSPETH, Justice.
This is a suit on a promissory note. The defense is partial failure of consideration. Defendant’s amended answer states:
“That the consideration of said note was as follows: (A) That the defendant herein had purchased from the copartnership of Nixon-Foster Service Company a certain electric refrigerator for $301.00 and a certain light plant and equipment, consisting of a generator and batteries, for the sum of $587.00, and that at the time of said purchase it was represented to defendant, and defendant was led to believe, by Nixon-Foster Service Company, acting by and through…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hennessy v. BaconSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Union Bank of Georgetown v. GearySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- McKinley v. WatkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
- Rauen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Wooley v. Shell Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moruzzi v. Federal Life & Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Bogle v. PotterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Thomas v. Barber's Super Markets, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Newbold v. FloranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.