Legal Opinion

Nixon-Foster Service Co. v. Morrow

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1936No. 4233PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSPETH, Justice.

This is a suit on a promissory note. The defense is partial failure of consideration. Defendant’s amended answer states:

“That the consideration of said note was as follows: (A) That the defendant herein had purchased from the copartnership of Nixon-Foster Service Company a certain electric refrigerator for $301.00 and a certain light plant and equipment, consisting of a generator and batteries, for the sum of $587.00, and that at the time of said purchase it was represented to defendant, and defendant was led to believe, by Nixon-Foster Service Company, acting by and through…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hennessy v. BaconSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Union Bank of Georgetown v. GearySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  3. McKinley v. WatkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  4. Rauen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Wooley v. Shell Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moruzzi v. Federal Life & Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Bogle v. PotterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. Thomas v. Barber's Super Markets, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Newbold v. FloranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API