Legal Opinion

Newbold v. Florance

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1952No. 5459PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGHEE, Justice.

This is the second appeal of this case. See 54 N.M. 296, 222 P.2d 1085.

In the former trial below the. plaintiff (appellant here) sought to recover commission claimed due for the sale o-f oil and gas leases which the defendant (appellee here) had sold to the Wood River Oil & Refining Company, Inc. The complaint was in two counts; first, upon an account stated in the sum of $12,500, and second, on quantum meruit for $8,200 which, it was alleged, the parties had agreed upon as the value of the plaintiff’s services. The defendant filed a counter claim for $500 which he claimed he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. First State Bank of Alamogordo v. McNewNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Gillett v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Park v. MilliganNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Heisch v. J. L. Bell & Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1902
  5. In Re Madison. Appeal of MarronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baker v. Shufflebarger & Associates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. SharpNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Utter v. Marsh Sales CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Atlantic Refining Company v. BeachNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Garry v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API